Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 13:55:34 01/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2001 at 14:41:29, James Robertson wrote: >On January 07, 2001 at 09:26:38, David Rasmussen wrote: > >>On January 07, 2001 at 09:05:16, Severi Salminen wrote: >> >>>On January 07, 2001 at 07:08:46, dario wrote: >>> >>>>[Event "WMCCC 2000"] >>>>[Site "London"] >>>>[Date "2000.08.21"] >>>>[Round "1"] >>>>[White "Crafty"] >>>>[Black "XiniX"] >>>>[Result "1-0"] >>>>[ECO "B00"] >>>>[PlyCount "22"] >>> >>>>1. e4 a6 2. d4 h6 3. Nf3 d6 4. Nc3 g5 5. Be2 Bg7 6. O-O e6 7. Be3 Ne7 8. Qd2 f5 >>>>9. exf5 Nxf5 10. Ne1 Nc6 11. Bh5+ O-O 1-0 >>> >>>Well, how would _your_ engine have played? >>> >>>Severi >> >>I think the point is that black castles out of check, which is illegal... > >I think Severi's point is that one shouldn't lol at a program's mistakes without >first trying to write one and see the problems involved himself.... > >James I think it's fine as long as there's some respect. These things are funny. I think that's part of the point. If computer chess has gotten to the point where there is no longer any risk of a program doing something outrageous, we've lost some of the fun. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.