Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 13:07:35 01/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2001 at 15:01:58, Christophe Theron wrote: >On January 08, 2001 at 13:11:34, Peter Kasinski wrote: > >>I am curious about what has been seen so far - please post the results, >>preferably at longer time controls. I have found Tiger 12e to be one of the most >>solid (if not _the_ most) and difficult to beat opponents. I am wondering if the >>effort to liven its play has come at the cost of ELO points. >> >>thank you, >>PK > > >Not at all. Tiger 13.0 (Rebel-Tiger II) is 50-70 ELO stronger than Tiger 12.0e >(Rebel-Tiger). Gambit Tiger 1.0 (which is also included with Rebel-Tiger II) is >about the same strength as Tiger 13.0, we still do not know which one (Chess >Tiger 13 or Gambit Tiger 1) is the strongest. > >Of course I would like to have some independant opinions about this. I'm not >really independant myself about Tiger. ;) > > Christophe They're both very strong. The common wisdom seems to be that Tiger 13.0 is stronger, but I suspect that Gambit Tiger will end up with the higher rating eventually.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.