Author: stuart taylor
Date: 15:16:50 01/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 08, 2001 at 16:07:35, Roy Eassa wrote: >On January 08, 2001 at 15:01:58, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On January 08, 2001 at 13:11:34, Peter Kasinski wrote: >> >>>I am curious about what has been seen so far - please post the results, >>>preferably at longer time controls. I have found Tiger 12e to be one of the most >>>solid (if not _the_ most) and difficult to beat opponents. I am wondering if the >>>effort to liven its play has come at the cost of ELO points. >>> >>>thank you, >>>PK >> >> >>Not at all. Tiger 13.0 (Rebel-Tiger II) is 50-70 ELO stronger than Tiger 12.0e >>(Rebel-Tiger). Gambit Tiger 1.0 (which is also included with Rebel-Tiger II) is >>about the same strength as Tiger 13.0, we still do not know which one (Chess >>Tiger 13 or Gambit Tiger 1) is the strongest. >> >>Of course I would like to have some independant opinions about this. I'm not >>really independant myself about Tiger. ;) >> >> Christophe > > >They're both very strong. The common wisdom seems to be that Tiger 13.0 is >stronger, but I suspect that Gambit Tiger will end up with the higher rating >eventually. It seems clear that GT is stronger in some aspects, but at the expense of being weaker in other aspects. I think that results have clearly shown that GT has a fair price to pay in ELO points. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.