Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Weekend 1200 player here / which program is is best for training?

Author: Laurence Chen

Date: 20:11:16 01/08/01

Go up one level in this thread


On January 08, 2001 at 19:32:21, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>On January 08, 2001 at 18:29:39, stuart taylor wrote:
>
>>On January 08, 2001 at 17:23:52, David Wilke wrote:
>>
>>>On January 08, 2001 at 03:49:05, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 07, 2001 at 19:18:45, Cliff Sears wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>>I would just like to know what computer chess program people think is best for a
>>>>>low rated player to improve his chess with, I.e., which program is best for
>>>>>training, studying and learning from?
>>>>
>>>>I think you'd do just fine repeately beating the hell out of some old weak unit
>>>>like a Chess Challenger 7.  You can pick up positional niceties by reading
>>>>books.  But if you are a 1200 player, you are probably making tactical mistakes,
>>>>and you'd gain a lot just by getting whacked in the forehead whenever you drop a
>>>>pawn.  Any computer can do this for you, but you want one that you can clobber
>>>>if you *don't* drop pawns.
>>>>
>>>>bruce
>>>
>>>Yes, possibly a weakened GNUChess? Or weakened Crafty? Don't go to something as
>>>powerful as Rebel Tiger or Fritz. you learn nothing other than how to get beat
>>>in under 25 moves.
>>
>>I suppose It's especially beneficial to practice against a program which only
>>picks you up on simple tactical errors which you can grasp at the momment, and
>>that as soon as you are aware and allert enough, you have chances of winning.
>>  I thought that chess master provides a stage by stage level increase which is
>>just perfect, but I havn't seen it yet myself. I'm thinking of getting it,
>>expecting to find this very feature. But if it is NOT that well designed I'd
>>like to know now, if someone can correct me.
>>S.Taylor
>
>I've never used the weakened opponents in Chessmaster, so please keep that in
>mind when evaluating what I said.
>
>That stuff may be very good, I don't know.  But I know that playing endless
>games against a cheesy microprocessor machine will improve your chess, because
>that's what I did.  I'm not a great player, but in the early 80's I got out of
>class D pretty quickly by playing weak machines.
>
>bruce
I agree with you.  I did the same when I was a class C player, I used to
practice a lot of games against Sargon 5 and Chessmaster 3000, and it helped me
to improve my chess and I made to the Expert Level, 2100+ in a few years.

Laurence




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.