Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 13:19:47 01/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2001 at 15:56:15, Ernst Walet wrote: >After some studying I think I have reconstructed game 4 of today. This is not >official, just my homework. > > > >[Event "Computer match Maastricht game 4"] >[Site "?"] >[Date "2001.01.09"] >[Round "2"] >[White "Van der Wiel, John"] >[Black "Comp Rebel 11"] >[Result "0-1"] >[ECO "A34"] > >1. c4 c5 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 d5 4. cxd5 Nxd5 5. Nc3 Nc7 6. Qa4+ Bd7 7. Qb3 Bc6 8. >Bxc6+ Nxc6 9. Qxb7 Nd4 10. Nf3 Rb8 11. Qe4 f5 12. Qd3 g6 13. O-O Bg7 14. Qc4 >Nxf3+ 15. exf3 Qd4 16. Qa4+ Qxa4 17. Nxa4 Ne6 18. Rb1 c4 19. b3 cxb3 20. Rxb3 >Rxb3 21. axb3 Kf7 22. Bb2 Bxb2 23. Nxb2 Nd4 24. Ra1 Nxf3+ 25. Kg2 Nxd2 26. b4 >Rb8 27. Nd3 Rb7 28. Ra6 Nc4 29. h4 e5 30. Rc6 e4 31. Rxc4 exd3 32. Rd4 Ke6 33. >Kf3 d2 34. Ke2 Rd7 35. Rxd7 Kxd7 36. Kxd2 Kd6 37. Kc3 Kd5 38. f3 h6 39. Kb3 Kd4 >40. Ka4 Ke3 41. f4 Kf3 42. Ka5 Kxg3 43. Ka6 Kxh4 44. Kxa7 g5 45. fxg5 hxg5 46. >b5 g4 0-1 > >Ernst. Yes, this move order looks correct. And a very nice and pure win by Rebel! White was a pawn up but had no activity. Bought his freedom for two pawns but lost the ending by a tempo. Almost a classical example of pressure/activity vs material and the importance of space and time in the ending. Thanks
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.