Author: José Carlos
Date: 07:27:02 01/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2001 at 07:46:41, Marc wrote: >As a Rebel fan I follow the match Rebel-van der Wiel with great interest. >I was happy to see Rebel win the 4th game. >I read van der Wiel was surprised by the pawn sac. on b7. >Now my question is: Who made that sac? Rebel or the Rebel team? Is it fair to >fight a computer (with typical anti-computer chess) and then be outsmarted by >human cleverness? >Or is Rebel playing with a normal opening book which won't be improved during >the match and isn't specially deviced to beat van der Wiel? >In short, isn't it hard to determine where human intelligence ends and computer >'stupidity' begins? The human intelligence begins in the good moves the program plays _due to the good work of its programmer/programming team_ and the computer stupidity fills the holes human intelligence left. Remember the book and the program were made _by the same human team_. José C. >I just get the impression van der Wiel is fighting a lot >more than just the program. (which possibly is just as it should be.) > >I don't know. > >Marc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.