Author: David Wilke
Date: 08:34:00 01/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2001 at 07:26:35, stuart taylor wrote: >The question is all in the heading. I mean with hardware of about 450 mhz. >upwards (till 1.2 ghz?). > This question is an ofshoot of Uri's comment that Rebel does better with more >time. > If you want to analyse a move for 2 hours, which program would have seen most >(of what is important and relevant, and consequently play the strongest move) in >those 2 hours. Or longer? >S.Taylor I would have to say from my testing that Gambit Tiger is one of the strongest along with Junior 6. They scored the same in my little tournament using 2 x PIII 866 256 megs ram, 40/2 + rest in 30 mins. I tested: Gandalf 4.32g Fritz 6 Junior 6 Nimzo 8 Rebel Tiger 13.0 Gambit Tiger 1.0 Hiarcs 7.32 Crafty 17.10 This is how they scored: Gambit Tiger: 62.5/80 ( Won series with Junior, hense 1st place ) Junior 6 : 62.5/80 ( Lost series 3-5-2 to Gambit Tiger ) Rebel Tiger 13.0: 58.5/80 Fritz 6: 51.5/80 ( Lost horribly to Gambit Tiger 2-6-2 ) Crafty 17.10 : 49.0/80 ( Won series vs Gandalf 5-1-4) Gandalf 4.32g: 47.5/80 Nimzo 8: 22.5/35 ( Started late, catching up now Won series vs Fritz 6 8-2-0) Hiarcs 7.32: 43.5/80 Each program used their own books, and had independant hardware. Take it for what it is worth.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.