Author: stuart taylor
Date: 08:53:37 01/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2001 at 11:34:00, David Wilke wrote: >On January 10, 2001 at 07:26:35, stuart taylor wrote: > >>The question is all in the heading. I mean with hardware of about 450 mhz. >>upwards (till 1.2 ghz?). >> This question is an ofshoot of Uri's comment that Rebel does better with more >>time. >> If you want to analyse a move for 2 hours, which program would have seen most >>(of what is important and relevant, and consequently play the strongest move) in >>those 2 hours. Or longer? >>S.Taylor > >I would have to say from my testing that Gambit Tiger is one of the strongest >along with Junior 6. > >They scored the same in my little tournament using 2 x PIII 866 256 megs ram, >40/2 + rest in 30 mins. > >I tested: > >Gandalf 4.32g >Fritz 6 >Junior 6 >Nimzo 8 >Rebel Tiger 13.0 >Gambit Tiger 1.0 >Hiarcs 7.32 >Crafty 17.10 > >This is how they scored: > >Gambit Tiger: 62.5/80 ( Won series with Junior, hense 1st place ) >Junior 6 : 62.5/80 ( Lost series 3-5-2 to Gambit Tiger ) >Rebel Tiger 13.0: 58.5/80 >Fritz 6: 51.5/80 ( Lost horribly to Gambit Tiger 2-6-2 ) >Crafty 17.10 : 49.0/80 ( Won series vs Gandalf 5-1-4) >Gandalf 4.32g: 47.5/80 >Nimzo 8: 22.5/35 ( Started late, catching up now Won series vs Fritz 6 8-2-0) >Hiarcs 7.32: 43.5/80 > >Each program used their own books, and had independant hardware. > >Take it for what it is worth. OK! but I was talking about giving 2 hours for EACH MOVE!!!!! S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.