Author: David Wilke
Date: 09:42:07 01/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2001 at 11:53:37, stuart taylor wrote: >On January 10, 2001 at 11:34:00, David Wilke wrote: > >>On January 10, 2001 at 07:26:35, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>The question is all in the heading. I mean with hardware of about 450 mhz. >>>upwards (till 1.2 ghz?). >>> This question is an ofshoot of Uri's comment that Rebel does better with more >>>time. >>> If you want to analyse a move for 2 hours, which program would have seen most >>>(of what is important and relevant, and consequently play the strongest move) in >>>those 2 hours. Or longer? >>>S.Taylor >> >>I would have to say from my testing that Gambit Tiger is one of the strongest >>along with Junior 6. >> >>They scored the same in my little tournament using 2 x PIII 866 256 megs ram, >>40/2 + rest in 30 mins. >> >>I tested: >> >>Gandalf 4.32g >>Fritz 6 >>Junior 6 >>Nimzo 8 >>Rebel Tiger 13.0 >>Gambit Tiger 1.0 >>Hiarcs 7.32 >>Crafty 17.10 >> >>This is how they scored: >> >>Gambit Tiger: 62.5/80 ( Won series with Junior, hense 1st place ) >>Junior 6 : 62.5/80 ( Lost series 3-5-2 to Gambit Tiger ) >>Rebel Tiger 13.0: 58.5/80 >>Fritz 6: 51.5/80 ( Lost horribly to Gambit Tiger 2-6-2 ) >>Crafty 17.10 : 49.0/80 ( Won series vs Gandalf 5-1-4) >>Gandalf 4.32g: 47.5/80 >>Nimzo 8: 22.5/35 ( Started late, catching up now Won series vs Fritz 6 8-2-0) >>Hiarcs 7.32: 43.5/80 >> >>Each program used their own books, and had independant hardware. >> >>Take it for what it is worth. > >OK! but I was talking about giving 2 hours for EACH MOVE!!!!! >S.Taylor I was giving an example of what I ran... that is all..
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.