Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 12:08:04 01/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2001 at 13:59:54, Jeroen Noomen wrote: >On January 10, 2001 at 12:17:56, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >I guess you are the only one who doesn't like this game. > >As many (also amateur) programs find beautiful tactical shots >in games played by the great masters from the past, you are going >to call those ones also 'not great games'? > >Jeroen > >>Not a great game.Every topprograme will find the moves of rebel in this >>game.Also the amateur yace 0.23.So a weak game by GM John van der Wiel. Hallo Jeroen. Rebel is a topprograme, so i hope for a big fight but today(!) John van der Wiel was no strong opponent.A defination of a great game is a victory after strong (!) resistance.To win in this way is no realy satisfaction in a higher sense.If 20 chessprogrames could win this game against van der Wiel it is not a extraordinary performance.No real reason to be proud on Rebel Century. I like the first three games very much but since yesterday v/d Wiel don´t play impressive.I hope for Rebel that John finds back in the match and play better.Rebel as one of the strongest programes of the wourld deserves it. Good luck Thomas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.