Author: William Penn
Date: 23:16:18 01/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2001 at 07:26:35, stuart taylor wrote: >The question is all in the heading. I mean with hardware of about 450 mhz. >upwards (till 1.2 ghz?). > This question is an ofshoot of Uri's comment that Rebel does better with more >time. > If you want to analyse a move for 2 hours, which program would have seen most >(of what is important and relevant, and consequently play the strongest move) in >those 2 hours. Or longer? >S.Taylor I have some experience in this area with Chessmaster 6000/8000, Hiarcs 7.32, and Fritz 6. I also tried Junior 6 for awhile but didn't like it. My feeling is that Hiarcs 7.32 would also not be a good choice because it tends to hang for a long time calculating trivial lines. Either Chessmaster or Fritz are good if you increase the selectivity to maximum (or more), and I favor Chessmaster 8000 but with my fingers crossed. I'm not convinced that the kinks have been eliminated from the latest CM engine!? WP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.