Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 00:40:07 01/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2001 at 03:30:01, Hermano Ecuadoriano wrote: >On January 11, 2001 at 02:56:02, Joshua Lee wrote: > >>I doubt very seriously that Rebel would earn more than 1 draw let alone any >>draws. If you set a match up with several programs on equal hardware working >>together (this way it's not neccesarily NPS that matters) all on the same side >>against the human this would be different. The problem being which programs to >>use and how to decide on the move. > >You know that Rebel 10 defeated Anand in a match at various time controls >(faster than 40/2), on a 450Mhz processor. >http://www.rebel.nl/anand.htm > >Century 3 being stronger, and on a faster machine, can't be dismissed like that. >Of course, Anand is almost 2800 now. Not to denigrate what Rebel did (after all, Anand is one of the best chess players of all time) but many of the games were at quicker time controls. What would happen at 40/2 with Rebel 3 on really fast hardware would be an interesting subject for speculation. Both of the targets have moved. Will we correctly predict where the arrow falls without any data?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.