Author: Drazen Marovic
Date: 13:00:40 01/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2001 at 15:46:54, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 11, 2001 at 15:41:31, Drazen Marovic wrote: > >>On January 11, 2001 at 13:39:03, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On January 11, 2001 at 11:43:10, Drazen Marovic wrote: >>> >>>> The sad thing is, if rebel had lost by a measly half point countless here >>>>would still try to deny comps gm strength. >>> >>>There is not enough evidence to confirm or deny the assertion either way. >>> >>>The 1/2 point swing in the other direction (for the comp) is no different. But >>>in any case, there are certainly not enough games to make a logical statement. >>>Only an emotional one. >> >>False. I have something you don't. The experience of grandmaster play. A life >>time of the study of the game. Non GM's do not beat experienced GM's in 6 game >>matches Especially by what should have been by 2 full points, if not for the >>graciousness of Schroeder in giving the last round draw. Sure it could have >>been luck, an amazing flip of the coin. If you believe in that unlikelyhood. >>There's nothing to talk about > >I'm afraid that you simply have a poor grasp of mathematics. > >And weaker players do beat stronger players by preparation. I'll leave it as an >excercise for you to find examples. > >Consider this you HAVE NO, NONE,NOT a CLUE what GM STRENGTH IS. By your faulty reasoning and not understanding what GM strength is. You disqaulify countless GM's from ever being GM strength. Pillsbury, Sultan Khan, And a good number of current day GM's as well.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.