Author: Amir Ban
Date: 03:58:16 02/09/98
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 1998 at 05:17:46, Kai Lübke wrote: >In general, I fully agree with the praise it gets at www.chessbase.com, >except for the allusion that it excels Hiarcs or Rebel in playing >strength which is based only on the (not undisputed) Nunn test set. >Here are some results from the Louguet II test on my machine for >comparison: > >Hiarcs 6 2535 >Rebel 9 2530 >Rebel 8 2525 >MChess 7 2480 >Fritz 5 2465 <----- >Chessm. 5500 2430 >MChess 5 2410 >Crafty 14.1 2405 > >So Fritz is among the best, but not at the very top. My test and >tournament games support that impression. Rating a program on the basis of a suite result is frivolous. Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.