Author: Côme
Date: 02:54:03 01/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2001 at 16:44:57, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 11, 2001 at 16:32:30, Drazen Marovic wrote: > >>On January 11, 2001 at 16:05:16, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On January 11, 2001 at 16:00:40, Drazen Marovic wrote: >>> >>>>On January 11, 2001 at 15:46:54, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 11, 2001 at 15:41:31, Drazen Marovic wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 11, 2001 at 13:39:03, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On January 11, 2001 at 11:43:10, Drazen Marovic wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The sad thing is, if rebel had lost by a measly half point countless here >>>>>>>>would still try to deny comps gm strength. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>There is not enough evidence to confirm or deny the assertion either way. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>The 1/2 point swing in the other direction (for the comp) is no different. But >>>>>>>in any case, there are certainly not enough games to make a logical statement. >>>>>>>Only an emotional one. >>>>>> >>>>>>False. I have something you don't. The experience of grandmaster play. A life >>>>>>time of the study of the game. Non GM's do not beat experienced GM's in 6 game >>>>>>matches Especially by what should have been by 2 full points, if not for the >>>>>>graciousness of Schroeder in giving the last round draw. Sure it could have >>>>>>been luck, an amazing flip of the coin. If you believe in that unlikelyhood. >>>>>>There's nothing to talk about >>>>> >>>>>I'm afraid that you simply have a poor grasp of mathematics. >>>>> >>>>>And weaker players do beat stronger players by preparation. I'll leave it as an >>>>>excercise for you to find examples. >>>>> >>>>>Consider this you HAVE NO, NONE,NOT a CLUE what GM STRENGTH IS. By your faulty reasoning and not understanding what GM strength is. You disqaulify countless GM's from ever being GM strength. Pillsbury, Sultan Khan, And a good number of current day GM's as well. >>> >>>I think it's time for you to get a grip. >>> >>>I know what GM strength is. I have played against one, in fact. >> >>played 1 ooh i'm impressed, i was one probably before you were born. > >I was born in 1957. Could well be. It's possible he was GM before you was born hehe Drazen Marovic is born in 1938. > >>But I am >>>talking about mathematical demonstration >> >>As i said you are not talking about GM strength. When the world of experts on >>the subject of chess,(i.e GM's)judge Pillsbury's play,to be GM strength, When >>the world of GM's judge Morphy's play to be GM strength. No one disagrees, >>apparently not even you! Are they the other thing, that you are confused and >>thinking we are talking about? This made up construct which does not even exist >>a mathematical GM, no! Today and in the past a person, could win their >>country's national championship never having played before in a tournament they >>would be granted the GM title! Many times such tournaments are only 10 rounds! >>No one would be walking around saying the person wasn't GM strength. Gm strength >>has definitely been demonstrated. > >Not mathematically. Just emotionally. I see that you are an emotional person, >and I respect your view of things. But mathematcally, you are ignorant.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.