Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 00:00:52 01/13/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2001 at 02:03:41, David Rasmussen wrote: >On January 12, 2001 at 22:26:05, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On January 12, 2001 at 22:16:44, Garry Evans wrote: >> >>>Hello Dan >>> >>> I have been following the thread between you, and Mr Drazonic with interest. I >>>have a question for you. Is it possible For to Prove that a Human Grandmaster >>>is Mathematically Grandmaster Strength? >> >>Sure, no different than a program. >> >>>If my understanding of your arguments >>>are correct, we cannot with 100% certainty. Isn't it true then with this logic >>>no one can be proven to be Grandmaster strength, including grandmasters!!! If >>>this is true then this whole subject is ludicrous. >> >>Exactly my point. We can prove (with any reasonable degree of certainty >>desired) what someone's ELO rating is. The way to get an accurate figure it to >>play many games under controlled conditions. >> >>We won't ever reach 100% certainty (but that is true of anything). > >Except death Rev: 21:4 >and taxes. There is something called a "Land Grant" that people like Quakers and the Amish get. They don't pay any taxes.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.