Author: Hermano Ecuadoriano
Date: 10:51:47 01/13/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2001 at 13:03:35, Brian Kostick wrote: >On January 10, 2001 at 21:14:48, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >relevant snip (refering to 10,000 rpm code post): >>Are there any source changes I should make to make this an easier thing >>to do? > > I'm wondering if wcrafty-18.01.exe (or whatever is current) might become >available at your ftp site?? I would like to run "bench" on it when it is >compiled with the same compiler as wcrafty-17.14.exe. > >Here (733-PIII)I get a wcrafty-17.14 bench of 122sec. and a Crafty1.exe(Corbit) >bench of 150sec. Is it realistic that version 18 would be slower? At any rate I >think side by side test would be nice to run before you bothered with source >changes. If this is already done then my post is in vain and I'm sorry to bother >you. > > I can compile with the Intel 5.0 compiler (trial run) with minimal changes to >the makefile.nt. I don't have the optimizing MS compiler if that is what was >used to build wcrafty-17.14.exe. > >Thanks for any info/insight that you can afford, Br5an PII-300 48M hash, 5M hashp version, nodes, n/s, time wcrafty-18.1 56199841 172922 325 CRAFTY1 56199841 153133 367 wcrafty-17.14 52518631 170515 308
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.