Author: Uri Blass
Date: 21:44:46 01/13/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2001 at 23:52:10, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 13, 2001 at 23:40:49, Mike S. wrote: > >>On January 13, 2001 at 23:00:54, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>(...) >>>I also think that only games at tournament time controls should count in the >>>discussions. Typically, the trojan horse attacks are made at blitz time >>>controls. If you give the computers 40/2 time control, they are far less likely >>>to get sucked into such a thing. >> >>I agree, but... an IM would reject the trojan sac under blitz conditions too :o) >>- Btw., the games mentioned were at 40/120' with one exception, and the last 3 >>on P600. Quite impressive. >> >>Anyway, I think that anti-anti code (like Crafty and probably Chess Tiger have >>it for this pattern) are useful improvements, towards "real" IM or GM strength. > >Since Crafty's code is public knowledge, soon all the other programs will have >it too. > >;-) I do not agree. Not everyone copies from Crafty. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.