Author: Ralph Patriquin
Date: 14:39:30 01/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
I tend to agree that computers are achieving GM strength in that if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, well then it must be a duck! The van der Wiel-Rebel match is one example of this. And what of Kasparov Deep Blue II? A crushing defeat of perhaps the strongest human player on the planet. Have no computer programs played in enough human-machine tournaments at slower time controls (not Blitz!) to achieve an official and not provisional rating at GM level? Or have they not been allowed to? If under tournament conditions a computer program performs at GM level I think it should be given its due. Quack!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.