Author: Edward Screven
Date: 15:08:50 01/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2001 at 15:55:04, Terry McCracken wrote: >On January 14, 2001 at 14:52:54, ERIQ wrote: > >>And how do you feel about it steve? > > >I don't know how Steve feels about it, but I, and I'm sure many here would >welcome this feature! I've seen many who after posting, post a follow up to >their owns posts due to mistakes or information they omitted. >And of course there is even a more simple reason, sometimes people post and wish >they had'nt! Then the're stuck with it! > >Please people, support ERIQ's suggestion!:) Thanks! > >Terry. what happens to replies? i don't want to see replies without being able to see the original post, and i don't certainly don't want to have replies i write removed if a post is retracted. personally, i think it is a good thing that authors can't retract their posts. it means that all readers can understand the context in which other posts are written. and it encourages authors to think before they click on "Submit". - edward
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.