Author: Brian Kostick
Date: 01:56:30 01/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2001 at 13:54:36, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: >On January 14, 2001 at 13:36:54, Jason Williamson wrote: > > >> >>a= 6.1 >>b= 6.2 >>c= 6.3 >>d= 6.4 >>e= 6.5 > >Nyah, I downloaded Fritz6h.zip, so now *I* have the 6.8 engine. >Or would h refer to "Holland"? > >Nah. Jeroen and all readers, All joking aside... Fritz6 users and contest-host will want a naming convention for this version. In the past I was aware of Fritz6 (OLD), Fritz6a, and Fritz6b. However I could be out of sync here, sometimes it's hard to stay current. If group consensus determines this engine to be Fritz6e (or whatever) that is ok by me. I would like to point out that the latest release (english version anyway) is the first one that I know of that contains a Version Info table. It states that this is version: 6.0.0.74 I would like to see version info become a standard for all ChessBase hosted engines, especially if it is not implied by the engines filename. Topic change: I do have some tactic results to share. These results of course do not necessarily translate to game play strenght. Test Set: Tactics Marathon, Marathon.cbh as supplied on the Fritz6 CD-ROM Fritz6a-64MB Hash/733-PIII Result: 190 out of 210 = 92% Average time: 42 seconds Fritz6(e?)-64MB Hash/733-PIII Result: 194 out of 210 = 92% Average time: 52 seconds Fritz5.32-64MB Hash/733-PIII Result: 188 out of 210 = 89% Average time: 35 seconds I've heard/read that Nimzo 8 is even better (higher percent and lower time) at this particular test. Best Wishes, Br5an
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.