Author: Pete Galati
Date: 07:45:06 01/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2001 at 09:33:19, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >On January 14, 2001 at 22:34:33, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On January 14, 2001 at 19:09:31, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: >> >>>A lot startup with finding it yet discarding it rapidly, most for Kc4 or R2d3 >>>with assessment =. >>>Fritz and Junior 6 didn't find it, Hiarcs 7.32 was at a loss, as was Comet B27, >>>Nimzo 99 did, but assessed it as a draw and Crafty 17.14 CB native engine >>>calculated it, yet not "convincingly" winning: >>> >> >>It takes about 10 minutes for Comet B28 to say that's the answer. It was still >>staying with that after about 3.7 hours. Personally, I doubt that I could have >>made the move, but I can see how very trapped Black's king is. I like this >>position, it would take a better player than me to play Rxc6. >> >>Pete >> >>[D]1r2k1r1/3p1p2/2bR1Bp1/p1K1P2p/5P1P/1P6/3R4/8 w - - 0 1 >> >>Comet-B.28 Sun Jan 14 17:17:17 2001 >> >>depth score sec nodes pv >> 1. -0.44 0 218 d2d3 >> 2. -1.19 0 612 d2d3 b8b4 >> 3. -0.61 0 2824 d2d3 c6e4 d3e3 >> 4. -0.58 0 7545 d2d3 c6e4 d3d4 e4f5 b3b4 >> 4. -0.58 0 11317 d2d3 c6e4 d3d4 e4f5 b3b4 >> 5. -0.58 0 18443 d2d3 c6e4 d3d4 e4f5 b3b4 >> 5. -0.58 0 27633 d2d3 c6e4 d3d4 e4f5 b3b4 >> 6. -0.60 0 56419 d2d3 c6e4 d3d4 e4f5 d6b6 b8a8 >> 6. -0.58 0 116235 c5c4 c6e4 d2a2 b8b4 c4c3 b4b5 a2a4 >> 6. -0.58 0 141888 c5c4 c6e4 d2a2 b8b4 c4c3 b4b5 a2a4 >> 7. -0.49 1 285515 c5c4 c6e4 d2a2 b8b4 c4c3 b4b5 d6a6 >> 7! -0.45 1 401542 d2d3 c6e4 d3c3 e4g2 c5d4 b8b4 c3c4 >> 7? -0.45 1 405938 d2d3 >> 7. -0.45 2 471328 d2d3 >> 8. -0.39 3 795683 d2d3 b8b5 c5d4 b5b4 d4c3 c6b5 d3d4 >> 8. -0.39 4 960071 d2d3 b8b5 c5d4 b5b4 d4c3 c6b5 d3d4 >> 9! -0.26 10 2399792 d2d3 b8b5 c5d4 b5b4 d4e3 b4e4 e3d2 >> 9? -0.26 13 3032036 d2d3 g8f8 c5d4 b8b5 f6g7 f8g8 g7f6 >> 9. -0.26 20 4465184 d2d3 g8f8 c5d4 b8b5 f6g7 f8g8 g7f6 >>10. -0.26 25 5696069 d2d3 g8f8 c5d4 b8b5 f6g7 b5c5 >>10. -0.26 30 6911175 d2d3 g8f8 c5d4 b8b5 f6g7 b5c5 >>11! -0.13 45 10487803 d2d3 g8f8 c5d4 b8b5 d3c3 b5b4 d4e3 >>11? -0.13 46 10590418 d2d3 >>11. -0.13 55 12820661 d2d3 >>12! +0.00 85 20754142 d2d3 b8b3 d3b3 e8f8 >>12? +0.00 86 20819792 d2d3 >>12. +0.00 99 24592471 d2d3 >>13. +0.08 254 64315624 d2d3 c6e4 d3c3 b8c8 c5d4 e4c6 d4e3 >>13. +0.08 290 74647969 d2d3 c6e4 d3c3 b8c8 c5d4 e4c6 d4e3 >>14. +0.09 528 137751189 d2d3 c6e4 d3c3 e4c6 c5d4 g8f8 c3d3 >>14! +0.21 605 159470582 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 b8e8 >>14? +0.21 616 162776186 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 b8e8 e5e6 >>14. +0.21 637 168016843 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 b8e8 e5e6 >>15! +0.34 667 175910314 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 b8e8 d2d8 >>15. +0.40 689 182300596 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 b8e8 d2d8 >>15. +0.40 847 227060769 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 b8e8 d2d8 >>16. +0.40 925 248582345 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 b8e8 d2d8 >>16. +0.40 1455 408572085 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 b8e8 d2d8 >>17! +0.53 1611 451081397 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 b8e8 d2d8 >>17? +0.53 1703 477598335 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 b8a8 e5e6 >>17. +0.53 2917 834208704 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 b8a8 e5e6 >>18! +0.66 3867 1111149081 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 b8a8 d2d8 >>18? +0.66 4102 1178111931 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 b8e8 e5e6 >>18. +0.66 8756 -1699400836 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 b8e8 e5e6 >>19! +0.79 9887 -1372911176 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 g6g5 >>19? +0.79 10334 -1238820920 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 b8e8 e5e6 >>19. +0.79 13416 -306685481 d6c6 d7c6 c5c6 e8f8 c6c7 b8e8 e5e6 > >Oops ... , the number of nodes gets negative. I'll take a look. >Thx, Uli I thought that was rather odd, but I just figured that it had some meaning that I didn't understand so I ignored it. I figured it was a designation of something other than negative. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.