Author: Pete Galati
Date: 19:10:07 01/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2001 at 12:24:10, Uri Blass wrote: >It is possible to use some games and a lot of computer time to genrate a test >suite. > >The idea is to give some top programs to analyze all the positions in the games >and to give them 24 hours per position. I'm not really understanding this sentence. Are you talking about in selected games generating an epd position of each move in the game and the slowly analyzing the most potebtially difficult positions? GM vs GM games? Computer vs computer games? GM vs computer games? All of the above? And I would like to see people start suggesting and posting games & positions to be included in this test suite because it seems like a worthwhile thing to pursue. Several people around CCC seem to be addicted to having programs anayzing positions, but personally I find it rather difficult to tie this computer up for 24 hours. Pete > >The test suite can include all the positions that there was an agreement between >all the top programs about the best move after 24 hours of search when part of >them needed more than 3 minutes to converge to the best move(otherwise the >position is too easy). > >People can claim that the fact that all of the program converge to the same move >is not a proof that it is the best move and I agree but I think that in >more than 90% of the cases the solution will be correct. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.