Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:16:56 01/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2001 at 09:12:13, Helmut Conrady wrote: >On January 16, 2001 at 07:05:36, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>On January 16, 2001 at 05:57:15, Peter Berger wrote: >> >>>This test makes no sense . >>> >>>I do understand that SSDF has a scientific, statistical conception . >>> >>>I also understand that it is important to play new programs against established >>>ones to get a good, reliable ranking . >>> >>>But the ELO system only works well within a certain range . When the difference >>>in strength and hardware is too high the results get completely random IMHO . >> >>It not too high in this case at all! In ssdf list Fritz6 has around 2600 and >>Shredder2 2400 - it's about 200 points, which is not too much. >> >>Jouni > >If you are listed 202 points higher than your opponent you will have a >performance of 76% to hold your rating (official FIDE list)! BTW: 17 from 21 is >81% and 251 ELo above your opponent. > >Helmut If people play more games with shredder2 then Deep Fritz is going to get closer to 100% because shredder2 has no learning function so the difference in rating is a function of the number of games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.