Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 06:24:28 01/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2001 at 00:32:42, Harald Faber wrote: >You can say whatever you want, but this result (and the other auto232 Rebel >Century results) is absolutely nonsense and out of value. Hi! I have compared earlier Rebels against Fritz5 and the results and the games where identical (50-100games), in some games it could be another move because of the longer thinking-time in the manual games. The only thing I can see in the log-file is game 1 correct, game 2 correct and so on, In a 80 game speed match the only information was correct. If you have studied the games i.e against Hiarcs, nimzo, S4 anf F6 you could see taht in every match C3 gave away 5-6 halfpoints in the endgames. Try to add 3 points for C3 and subtract 3 points for the opponents and I guess it could compete with Tiger12 and Shredder4. This is a known problem with all Rebels and I hope that some of the beta-testers should have point it out but instead a IM-rewiew told us the best side of the program is the endgame. Bertil
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.