Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 09:42:10 01/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2001 at 09:24:28, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On January 16, 2001 at 00:32:42, Harald Faber wrote: > >>You can say whatever you want, but this result (and the other auto232 Rebel >>Century results) is absolutely nonsense and out of value. > >Hi! > >I have compared earlier Rebels against Fritz5 and the results and the games >where identical (50-100games), in some games it could be another move because of >the longer thinking-time in the manual games. The only thing I can see in the >log-file is game 1 correct, game 2 correct and so on, In a 80 game speed match >the only information was correct. The engine check is only for 10-15 seconds, a fraction of a 40/2h game. Furthermore not in every game the engine check is done. All what counts is that the error message pops up frequently, the proof that something is wrong. >If you have studied the games i.e against Hiarcs, nimzo, S4 anf F6 you could see >taht in every match C3 gave away 5-6 halfpoints in the endgames. Try to add 3 >points for C3 and subtract 3 points for the opponents and I guess it could >compete with Tiger12 and Shredder4. This is a known problem with all Rebels and Why not simply believe what producers write in the manual. >I hope that some of the beta-testers should have point it out but instead a >IM-rewiew told us the best side of the program is the endgame. GM v/d Wiel said the the very same as the IM :) Ed >Bertil
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.