Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:15:20 01/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2001 at 05:04:36, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 17, 2001 at 04:52:01, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On January 17, 2001 at 04:38:13, Dan Andersson wrote: >> >>>Yes, one should not weaken the pawn position in that way. My point is that Rebel >>>was forced into the pawn endgame instead of going for it immediatelly, if it had >>>seen the endgame as winning it would have forced it. >> >>During that part of the game I was very surprised to see Rebel keeping a >>+pawn score all the time even after Rd7 as the remaining pawn ending is >>equal in material. I did not get it. If memory serves me well the first >>3-4 moves in the end-game the Rebel score remained a pawn up before the >>score started to climb, seeing the win. I still must check my code where >>on earth that positional advantage comes from :) > >I think that you should check because the advantage is clearly more than one >pawn and Deep Fritz has no problem to see more than 2 pawns advantage at >tournament time control. > >Uri The score go down after more time only to fail high again so it seems that Deep Fritz does not see deeper than Rebel. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.