Author: David Dahlem
Date: 08:09:27 01/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2001 at 06:25:04, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 17, 2001 at 05:28:37, allan johnson wrote: > >>On January 16, 2001 at 20:09:53, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>Here are the remarks that describe the actual positions: >>>http://home.interact.se/~w100107/pos.htm >>> >>>It also gives the names of the annotators. >> >>Dann Any suggestions as to why Century3 did so badly [relatively] in >>the test suites? >>Allan > >Part of the people who analyzed the games are not close to be GM's. > >For example one of them Magnus holm has only 2198 fide rating(I searched his >name in the online database of chessbase). > >I think that it is a bad idea to trust this test. > >I do not trust even GM's. > >I prefer to see a test suite that was generated by chess programs because I >believe more in their moves. > >Uri > >Uri I agree. Why not use these positions in your suggestion for top engines to analyze for 24 hours? Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.