Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:02:17 01/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2001 at 11:22:39, James T. Walker wrote: >On January 17, 2001 at 10:59:36, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On January 17, 2001 at 10:39:31, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>It looks like Deep Fritz is going to come pretty low on the next ssdf rating >>>list. Pretty low indeed! >> >>Not necessarily. It depends on the other results. The current results against >>against Shredder 2 and Rebel Century 3.0 are quite good. So the points "lost" >>against Junior may be gained somewhere else. >> >>Mogens. > >Does anyone know if the SSDF is allowing "duplicate" games in their testing? >Junior 6 is the worst program I know of for trying to duplicate won games. I >would like to know if it is inflating it's rating with this method. >Jim I think that you are wrong and that Fritz is the worst program and not Junior. I remmeber a case when Junior repeated the same opening that it won but could not win the game because it did not continue in the same way. I remember a case when Fritz5 won Rebel8 by the same way 5 times. I do not remember something worse than it in the ssdf games. I also do not believe that Junior can duplicate games against Deep Fritz because Deep Fritz is not a program without learning function. The good results of Junior were in the first games and not in the last games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.