Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: [Slightly OT] Processor catch question

Author: William Bryant

Date: 15:46:42 01/17/01

Go up one level in this thread


On January 17, 2001 at 00:07:15, Will Singleton wrote:

>On January 16, 2001 at 21:48:59, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On January 16, 2001 at 20:08:38, William Bryant wrote:
>>
>>>What is the difference between L2 and L3 catch systems.
>>>
>>>For example what would be the difference between an L2 1MB catch, and
>>>a L2 256K catch with an L3 1MB catch.
>>>
>>>Thanks.
>>>
>>>william
>>>wbryant@ix.netcom.com
>>
>>
>>This is a hierarchy.  L1 is the fastest cache, but it is also the smallest.
>>L2 is slower than L1, but faster than memory.  It is also bigger than L1, but
>>smaller than main memory.  L3 simply extends this.  The only machine I have
>>used recently that had a L3 cache was the Alpha...
>
>
>The new Macs have an L3 cache.  If and when they actually appear.

I stumbled onto the specs for the new Mac's on the Apple website.  They price
for a G3 laptop dropped dramatically, when I went to the site to check on it,
they were gone.  Now what you see is the new machines, I suspect announced at
MacWorld Expo.

The new G4 is up to 766mhz -- still a far cry from 1ghz, with a 256k L2 (down
from 1 MB) and a 1 MB L3.  I wonder if the catch was part of the speed problem?
Why else move from L2 to L3?

William
wbryant@ix.netcom.com




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.