Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 16:12:01 01/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2001 at 18:34:39, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On January 17, 2001 at 15:57:33, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On January 17, 2001 at 15:49:43, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On January 17, 2001 at 13:58:58, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>> >>>>On January 17, 2001 at 12:53:43, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 16, 2001 at 01:08:13, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 16, 2001 at 01:03:20, Tania Devora wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>A very difficult question... All top programs was very good in tactics, but i >>>>>>>think that Deep Fritz is in the top. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Gambit Tiger also is a great program in tactics... with a very atractive style >>>>>>>of play. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Tanny. >>>>>> >>>>>>Sorry, but it's either. It's either Nimzo 8 or Goliath. >>>>>> >>>>>>Jouni >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>I would take Fritz _every_ time myself... >>>> >>>>Sure. First is Fritz, either F6a or Deep Fritz, then and quite behind Tiger, >>>>Nimzo, CM and Goliath. >>>> >>>>Enrique >>> >>>Is this information based on your secret test suite? >> >>Yes. It is also quite obvious when you watch the games, but I guess the test is >>more reliable than observation of a limited number of games. >> >>>Did you find that Fritz is better in this test than the latest versions of the >>>latest tigers,nimzo8, CM8000 and Goliath? >> >>Quite a bit better in finding tactical strokes. DF on 1 CPU comes slightly >>better than F6a, and in another group come Tiger 13 and 12, Nimzo, CM 6000 and >>Goliath. >> >>Enrique >> >>>Uri >Hi! > >Have you already checked Nimzo8? I received it just in time to enter it in my tournament. In a couple of weeks I'll be done with the games and then I will run the test with Nimzo 8. Enrique > Equal to Nimzo7.32? I thought it should be >slightly better, but I don't bet on it! > >Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.