Author: Aaron Tay
Date: 20:45:59 01/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2001 at 03:22:11, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 16, 2001 at 19:21:11, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>On January 16, 2001 at 16:59:55, Pete Galati wrote: >> >>>On January 16, 2001 at 15:06:10, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >>> >>>>Morozevich played strong 16...Nd3+! >>>> >>>>What chess program played this move ? >>>> >>>>[Event "Corus Wijk aan Zee NED "] >>>>[Site "?"] >>>>[Date "2001.??.??"] >>>>[Round "3"] >>>>[White "Van Wely,L"] >>>>[Black "Morozevich,A"] >>>>[WhiteElo "2700"] >>>>[BlackElo "2745"] >>>>[ECO "D16"] >>>>[Result "0-1"] >>>> >>>>1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 dxc4 5. a4 c5 6. d5 Bf5 >>>>7. e3 e6 8. Bxc4 exd5 9. Nxd5 Nc6 10. Qb3 Qd7 11. Nxf6+ >>>>gxf6 12. Bd2 Rg8 13. Bc3 O-O-O 14. Bxf7 Rxg2 15. Nh4 Ne5 >>>>16. Nxf5 Nd3+ 17. Kf1 Rxf2+ 18. Kg1 Kb8 19. Qe6 Rxf5 20. h4 >>>>Bd6 21. Rf1 Rg8+ 0-1 >>>> >>>>FEN: >>>> >>>>[D]2kr1b2/pp1q1B1p/5p2/2p1nN2/P7/1QB1P3/1P3PrP/R3K2R b KQ - 0 16 >>>> >>>>Eduard >>> >>>Dos Comet running in the background liked Nd3+ for a while, then after 21 >>>minutes changed it's mind to Nxf7. >>> >>>Pete >>> >>>Comet-B.28 Tue Jan 16 14:50:01 2001 >>> >>>depth score sec nodes pv >>> 1. +1.49 0 1321 d7f5 >>> 2. -0.24 0 2907 e5f7 b3c2 >>> 3. +1.21 0 14958 e5d3 e1f1 g2f2 f1g1 f2f5 f7e6 f5g5 >>> 4. +1.16 0 46744 e5d3 e1f1 g2f2 f1g1 f2f5 f7e6 f5g5 >>> 4. +1.16 0 187435 e5d3 e1f1 g2f2 f1g1 f2f5 f7e6 f5g5 >>> 5. +1.16 0 258382 e5d3 e1f1 g2f2 f1g1 >>> 5. +1.16 1 496322 e5d3 e1f1 g2f2 f1g1 >>> 6? +1.02 2 788119 e5d3 e1f1 g2f2 f1g1 d7f7 b3f7 f2f5 >>> 6? +0.75 88 2086889 e5d3 e1f1 d7f7 b3f7 d3f2 >>> 6? +0.48 93 3053682 e5d3 e1f1 d7f7 b3f7 d3f2 >>> 6? +0.21 96 3878702 e5d3 e1f1 d7f7 b3f7 d3f2 >>> 6. +0.00 100 4672894 e5d3 e1f1 g2f2 f1g1 f2f5 f7e6 f5g5 >>> 6. +0.00 1260 5209069 e5d3 e1f1 g2f2 f1g1 f2f5 f7e6 f5g5 >>> 7. +0.00 1263 5873499 e5d3 e1f1 g2f2 f1g1 f2f5 f7e6 f5g5 >>> 7! +0.13 1264 6070317 e5f7 f5h4 g2g5 b3b7 d7b7 c3f6 >>> 7! +0.40 1265 6275782 e5f7 b3f7 d7f7 c3f6 >>> 7! +0.67 1266 6632664 e5f7 b3f7 d7f7 c3f6 >>> 7? +0.67 1267 6651861 e5f7 b3c2 d7c6 >>> 7. +0.67 1275 8573444 e5f7 b3c2 d7c6 >>> 8? +0.53 1276 8785395 e5f7 f5h4 g2g4 h4f3 f7e5 f3e5 f6e5 >>> 8. +0.46 2248 17976936 e5f7 f5h4 g2g4 h4f3 d7c6 b3f7 c6f3 >>> 8. +0.46 2268 22600003 e5f7 f5h4 g2g4 h4f3 d7c6 b3f7 c6f3 >>> 9! +0.59 2277 24372582 e5f7 f5h4 g2g4 h4f3 d7c6 b3b7 c6b7 >>> 9. +0.69 3557 26492877 e5f7 b3c2 f7e5 c3e5 f6e5 f5h4 g2g5 >>> 9. +0.69 3616 30417017 e5f7 b3c2 f7e5 c3e5 f6e5 f5h4 g2g5 >>> >>>==> My Move: e5f7 in 60:16 >> >>Hello! >> >>Thanks, too all my programs don't find this move 16.Nd3+! in 30 minutes. :) > >Deep Fritz found Nd3+ after 35 minutes and 44 seconds on p800 with 64 Mbytes >hash tables(I used the pentium o read posts in this club at the same time so it >could be slightly faster) so I guess that better hardware is the solution for >the problem(I guess that p1000 is enough). > >Uri A candiate for your proposed computer test suite? Presumably, all top programs will eventually converge to the answer given time.. So perhaps this problem is too simple? But personally i feel such a test suite would be not very useful, for comparing programs over time espically if you use newer hardware.In the future, Fritz8? for example might find the solution to the above problem under 3 minutes, but is this improvement due to hardware improvement or the strenght of the program? Perhaps a fairer test would be to take into account computer speed, Node/s or whatever?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.