Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:00:28 01/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2001 at 06:04:05, Harald Faber wrote: >On January 16, 2001 at 05:12:12, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On January 16, 2001 at 01:57:59, Hans Christian Lykke wrote: >> >>>On January 16, 2001 at 00:32:42, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>>You can say whatever you want, but this result (and the other auto232 Rebel >>>>Century results) is absolutely nonsense and out of value. >>> >>> >>>You can say whatever you want, but this result (and the other auto232 Rebel >>>>Century results) is absolutely necessery and of great value to make the SSDF-list! >> >>No great value at all. It will only hurt the creditability of your list. > > >It is likely that it will hurt Rebels creditability, not the SSDF's. Consider >that. It might have been better to forbid publishing results gained by playing >auto232-games with Century 3. I would have done so. I do not agree. I do not like forbidding to publish results. The same people who believe the ssdf will think that Rebel has something to hide by forbidding to publish results so Rebel will earn nothing from it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.