Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: itanium

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 12:46:16 01/18/01

Go up one level in this thread


On January 18, 2001 at 15:14:05, Eugene Nalimov wrote:
[snip]
>>Only a small part of the server market needs this I would think. I don't believe
>>you can conclude "Athlon does not compete with itanium" from this.
>
>Yes, 95% of servers are small ones. But people who choose hardware/spftware
>combinations hope that one day their company will grow, and they will have to
>process huse amount of data. So they are choosing scalable solutions, even if
>95% of them will never use that scalability.

Never is the wrong word.  If fact, surely it is "how soon?" rather than never.
I remember when the 386 chip first came out.  Too expensive for desktops.  I
remember when the 486 chip first came out.  Too expensive for desktops.  I
remember when the pentium  first came out.  Too expensive for desktops.  I
remember when the Xeon first came out ...

If there is anything we can learn from this is that:
1.  Eventually, the costs do come down.  At that point the servers will become
desktop systems and there will be a new generation of servers.
2.  Eventually, you *WILL* need the power.  Will you compete effectively if you
are still using a 80286?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.