Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:59:09 01/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2001 at 17:32:21, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On January 18, 2001 at 17:25:02, Torstein Hall wrote: > >>On January 18, 2001 at 17:06:13, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>It do stops at the end of the games from time to time, but Fritz 6 on my old >>200Mhz looks like its holding of Gambit Tiger on my newer PIII 700mhz in 20 min. >>blitz. Must be that horrible 0.00 Fritz eval! :))))) >> >>Torstein >> >>PS I do expect the score to change in favor og GT after a while on that much >>more hardware! > >fritz is doing pre-processing. Can you give examples for it. I found that Shredder and Tiger do preprocessing when I analyzed my correspondence games. I know that Gandalf does not do preprocessing. My impression is that Deep Fritz does not do preprocessing or does less preprocessing but my impression may be wrong because I used Shredder and Tiger more for analysis. >the more fritz computes, the deeper it searches. the deeper it searches, >the more stupid it gets. I disagree. Usually programs get better when they compute deeper and Deep fritz is no exception. Fritz can be sometimes stupid but it is the same for other programs and every program has positions that it does not understand including programs that avoid preprocessing. There is no general case. Deep Fritz was smarter than Gandlaf in enrique's tournament and did a good sacrifice that gandalf did not understand(I guess that the sacrifice is correct because Deep Fritz won the game but I am not sure and I may be wrong). Here is the relevant position from one of the games: [D]r2qr1k1/1Bp1bppp/1n6/pP2p3/8/P1NP2P1/4PP1P/1RBQ1bK1 w - - 0 1 Deep Fritz played Qxf1 and not Bxa8 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.