Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: If you like to find a mate...

Author: Heiner Marxen

Date: 04:17:48 01/19/01

Go up one level in this thread


On January 18, 2001 at 22:06:37, leonid wrote:

>On January 18, 2001 at 19:13:22, Paul wrote:
>
>>On January 18, 2001 at 19:01:08, Pete Galati wrote:
>>
>>>On January 18, 2001 at 18:44:05, leonid wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi!
>>>>
>>>>If you would like to find a mate here is one position. It is very easy to solve
>>>>but not that simple to find shortest mate.
>>>>
>>>>I failed here even in 3 hours to find shortest mate through brute force search.
>>>>Maybe you will have better chance.
>>>>
>>>> 1k4q1/1pppPr2/PbbP1N1n/QP2rn1R/1q6/1q2RBB1/q1q2PPP/6NK black to go
>>>>
>>>>Leonid.
>>>
>>>Is this the right position?
>>>
>>>[D]1k4q1/1pppPr2/PbbP1N1n/QP2rn1R/1q6/1q2RBB1/q1q2PPP/6NK b - - 0 1
>>
>>If so, then mine says it's a mate in 10 for black starting with Nxg3+ ...
>>It looks like a daily reverse auction ... Anyone lower, anyone? :)
>>
>>Paul
>
>Position is exact and response 10 moves must be or shortest possible, or very
>close move. Actually my program solved this position through selective search in
>11 moves. Solution was instant. Finding shortest mate is the other story.
>Through brute force program said in 8 mate is not there. Only 9 still could be
>looked.
>
>I found that branching factor was terrible to see 9 moves. AMD 400Mhz.
>
>8 moves - 2h 44 min.
>7 moves - 2 min 48 sec.
>6 moves - 7 sec.
>
>Leonid.

Chest says "no mate in 9" in 180 sec (3 min) (K7/600 350MB TT)
My branching factor is not that bad (depth, seconds, speed, TT-nodes in-out)
#  1      0.00  0.87          1-         0
#  2      0.00  1.00          1-         0
#  3      0.01  0.97         45-         0
#  4      0.07  1.07        338-         0
#  5      0.37  1.27       1971-         0
#  6      1.78  1.66       9653-         0
#  7      9.25  1.99      52004-         0
#  8     41.00  2.45     261032-         0
#  9    180.08  2.97    1253899-         1

May be that your move ordering for the defender (here: white) is not
so good.  Aggresive defender moves are important to reduce the size
of the search trees.

You seem to like bizarre positions :-)

Heiner



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.