Author: Larry Griffiths
Date: 18:52:10 01/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 19, 2001 at 14:36:57, Paul wrote: >On January 19, 2001 at 12:32:06, Larry Griffiths wrote: > >>On January 19, 2001 at 04:36:32, Severi Salminen wrote: >> >>> >>>>>Would there be any downside to the inline function? >>>> >>>>Some compilers might decide to treat it as a normal function instead of inlining >>>>it, in some cases. I think Borland does this if the inline function contains >>>>loops or other things it considers "too complex". >>> >>>In VC++ 6.0 you can specify __forceinline and compiler _will_ make it an inline >>>function. Very useful. There might be this option in Borland as well - which one >>>are you using? >>> >>>Severi >> >>I am using Borland Builder 5 and I have never found any forceinline like VC has. >> >>Larry. > >I'm also using BCB5, and indeed there isn't a forceinline, unfortunately :( >I like it very much for GUI building and programming, but VC++ seems to >have a lot more options for optimizing ... > >Paul I also like the VCL, Paul. I have resorted to using #defines a lot and writing inline assembler whenever possible. I have been using a lot of MMX instructions lately and my program may only run on Pentium II or higher machines in the near future. Larry.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.