Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 19:25:46 01/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 19, 2001 at 19:13:56, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >Uri again like all positions of yours, >this is NOT a forced combination. > >It's unforced. > >All you need is searchdepth, 1M nodes a second. >A material evaluation, not even piece square tables >needed, and not a single extension. Vincent, I cannot see at all, how this applies to the position of this discussion. I am not sure, if Rc3 draws here, but certainly Rb6 will loose. Without TBs, my engine can see the loss of a pawn after Rb6 and after Rc3. Nevertheless, with TBs rather soon it is seen, that Rb6 is leading to a forced mate, while this is not seen for Rc3. Actually, without TBs, after Rb6 and after Rc3 I get essentially the same scores at the same search depth. I have no idea, how Rb6 can be avoided based on a material evaluation only. -- Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.