Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Crafty and Alpha processors

Author: Eugene Nalimov

Date: 13:12:25 01/20/01

Go up one level in this thread


On January 20, 2001 at 16:01:46, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On January 20, 2001 at 15:39:02, Joshua Lee wrote:
>
>>How fast is crafty on a 800Mhz PIII? AMD Athlon at 800Mhz? I don't know about
>>the Alpha too much which CPU speeds do they offer for comparison? Would a Dual
>>or Quad Xenon or Athlon compare with a Single Alpha ? Thanks
>
>Here is the output for running WAC at 60 seconds per move on a single xeon cpu,
>700mhz, 1M L2 cache:
>test results summary:
>
>total positions searched..........         300
>number right......................         299
>number wrong......................           1
>percentage right..................          99
>percentage wrong..................           0
>total nodes searched.............. 132559227.0
>average search depth..............         4.7
>nodes per second..................      412161
>
>
>
>Here is the same test run on a 21264 alpha at 600mhz:
>
>test results summary:
>
>total positions searched..........         300
>number right......................         300
>number wrong......................           0
>percentage right..................         100
>percentage wrong..................           0
>total nodes searched.............. 236973211.0
>average search depth..............         4.5
>nodes per second..................      783641
>
>As you can see, the alpha has a 16% slower clock speed, but is nearly 2x
>faster...
>
>Bob

I believe that part of the explanation is the compiler. You are using obsolete
GNU compiler on the x86, but state-of-the-art compiler on Alpha. Good x86 C
compiler will give you at least additional 20%.

Eugene



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.