Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:31:59 01/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2001 at 17:24:33, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >On January 20, 2001 at 17:00:09, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On January 20, 2001 at 16:13:42, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>comet +3.90 >>>shredder4 chessbits -3.30 >>> >>>will post game soon, when it is over. >>> >>>unbelievable. >> >>I guess that it is only because of the fact that Shredder4 is weak in tactics >>and cannot win won positions. > >Shredder4 and tactically weak ? >You can't be serious. Comet doesn't have the least chance to overplay Shredder4 >tactically. I know that one of the improvement from Shredder4 to shredder5 was tactics. I also know that Comet played Rxg2+ and white has a big advantage after Rxg2+ so the only way that I can explain the fact that shredder is losing is a tactical mistake. The only case that I am wrong is if the evaluation of chess programs is the mistake when Rxg2+ is a good move and we have to see the game in order to know. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.