Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 03:05:17 01/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 21, 2001 at 05:58:36, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 21, 2001 at 05:24:00, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >> >>[Event "Odyssee2001-Tournament"] >>[Site "k6-400, 40/120"] >>[Date "2001.01.20"] >>[Round "1"] >>[White "Shredder4 CBits"] >>[Black "Comet B27"] >>[Result "0-1"] >>[ECO "C99"] >>[PlyCount "128"] >>[EventDate "2001.01.20"] >> >>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 >>O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 c5 11. d4 Qc7 12. Nbd2 cxd4 13. cxd4 Nc6 14. Nb3 a5 15. >>Be3 a4 16. Nbd2 Bd7 17. Nf1 Rfe8 18. Rc1 Qb7 19. Ng3 a3 20. b3 Rac8 21. Qd2 >>exd4 22. Nxd4 d5 23. Nxc6 Bxc6 24. e5 Ne4 25. Bxe4 dxe4 26. Nf5 Bf8 27. Nd6 >>Bxd6 28. exd6 Re6 29. Bf4 Rg6 30. Re3 h6 31. Rec3 e3 > > >I see that Comet found the right move when I understood from your perevious post >that Comet did not find it and played 31...Rxg2+. > >I believed that it did not find it based on >http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?150998 but I guess there was a >misunderstanding and you did not mean to say that Comet played 31...Rxg2+. > >Comet needs a long time to see 31...e3 at depth 11 and I thought that it has not >enough time to do it at 40/2 hours. > >CometB27 on pIII800(64 hash) under chessbase needs 6 minutes and 43 seconds to >find e3. > It's probably pondering which made it possible to find the right move here. It seems that Shredder had allocated a large time for its move (because of its fail-low). I guess that Comet could profit from this. On the other hand, when Comet detects a fail low, it allocates a lot time to resolve it ( up to about 6 times the usual average time). Uli > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.