Author: Garry Evans
Date: 12:16:16 01/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 21, 2001 at 15:06:38, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On January 21, 2001 at 14:31:24, Garry Evans wrote: > >>On January 21, 2001 at 14:19:42, Mogens Larsen wrote: >> >>>On January 21, 2001 at 09:29:35, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>> >>>>On January 21, 2001 at 09:26:46, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>All that I can conclude by reading different messages by SSDF tester is that >>>>>they can't wait for the Rebel Tiger 13.0 patch to be released in order to start >>>>>testing the new Tiger. Deep Fritz and Rebel Century 3 has been tested with more >>>>>than three programs each. I understand that Nimzo 8 was released to the SSDF >>>>>testers at the same time that Deep Fritz was released, but for some reason none >>>>>of the testers have started to test Nimzo 8 yet. >>>> >>>>How do you know? Did you ask them and they confirmed your conspiracy theory? >>>> >>>>Enrique >>> >>>You can't confirm a conspiracy theory otherwise there wouldn't be any. Too bad >>>they didn't kept silent and allowed the it to grow. >>> >>>I've also heard that someone is tampering with the DOS autoplayer. Can that be >>>true? >>> >>>Mogens. >> >> >> You would think that someone with a PHD would know better than to ask such a >>Rediculous Question?? > >In case you are referring to me, I was being ironic. The original question was >so obviously nonsensical that I thought the usual smiley was unnecessary in my >reply. I already knew that the SSDF was testing Nimzo 8 and I read about too >many ridiculous conspiracy theories concerning the SSDF. > >Enrique I don't no how "nonsensical" the question was, I do believe in the integrity of the SSdf, but i think anyone could find many reasons why the SSDF would do exactly what the original poster suggested.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.