Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF can't wait to test certain Programs; is there a Conspiracy ?

Author: Torstein Hall

Date: 14:24:37 01/21/01

Go up one level in this thread


On January 21, 2001 at 15:37:58, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:

>On January 21, 2001 at 15:13:52, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On January 21, 2001 at 15:06:38, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>>
>>>On January 21, 2001 at 14:31:24, Garry Evans wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 21, 2001 at 14:19:42, Mogens Larsen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On January 21, 2001 at 09:29:35, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On January 21, 2001 at 09:26:46, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>All that I can conclude by reading different messages by SSDF tester is that
>>>>>>>they can't wait for the Rebel Tiger 13.0 patch to be released in order to start
>>>>>>>testing the new Tiger. Deep Fritz and Rebel Century 3 has been tested with more
>>>>>>>than three programs each. I understand that Nimzo 8 was released to the SSDF
>>>>>>>testers at the same time that Deep Fritz was released, but for some reason none
>>>>>>>of the testers have started to test Nimzo 8 yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>How do you know? Did you ask them and they confirmed your conspiracy theory?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Enrique
>>>>>
>>>>>You can't confirm a conspiracy theory otherwise there wouldn't be any. Too bad
>>>>>they didn't kept silent and allowed the it to grow.
>>>>>
>>>>>I've also heard that someone is tampering with the DOS autoplayer. Can that be
>>>>>true?
>>>>>
>>>>>Mogens.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  You would think that someone with a PHD would know better than to ask such a
>>>>Rediculous Question??
>>>
>>>In case you are referring to me, I was being ironic. The original question was
>>>so obviously nonsensical that I thought the usual smiley was unnecessary in my
>>>reply. I already knew that the SSDF was testing Nimzo 8 and I read about too
>>>many ridiculous conspiracy theories concerning the SSDF.
>>
>>Next time, remember that a large fraction of the earth's population is smiley
>>impaired.
>
>I'm afraid you are right. But why the smiley that never existed in letters
>becomes a necessity in Internet communications? Funny, isn't it?
>
>>In order to prevent them from missing the humor, please, be kind and
>>add a smiley.  Like this:
>>
>>You aren't paranoid, we really ARE out to get you.
>>;-)
>
>:)
>
>>I always make mine winking.  That's because he thinks funny thoughts.
>
>:):):)
>
>Enrique

I guess you all heard this one? Being paranoid do not necessarly mean that
nobody aint pursuing you! :-o)

Torstein



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.