Author: Paul
Date: 16:59:50 01/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 21, 2001 at 19:39:16, Pete Galati wrote: >On January 21, 2001 at 19:26:43, Paul wrote: >>Well, I *was* waiting for your solutions from Comet & Junior ... >>or have you been rebooting al this time ;) >> >>Paul > >Oops, I must be becoming known for what I run analysis through, but I figure >everyone else will use Fritz and Crafty etc., so why should I? Right! But it's just that that's what you've used the last couple of days. :) >Actually, I've been running Junior on that other position that you pasted in >that you said you gotta go deep to get an answer on, and Junior doesn't seem to >be coming up with anything (that I know of) > >New position >5n2/B3K3/2p2Np1/4k3/7P/3bN1P1/2Prn1P1/1q6 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Junior 6.0: >[.......] >1.Neg4+ Kf5 2.Nh6+ Ke5 3.Nf7+ Kf5 4.Nd6+ Ke5 5.Ng4+ Kd5 6.c4+ Bxc4 7.Ne3+ Ke5 >8.Ndxc4+ Ke4 9.Nxd2+ Kd3 10.Nxb1 > +- (4.74) Depth: 20 00:17:19 573914kN >1.Neg4+ Kf5 2.Nh6+ Ke5 3.Nf7+ Kf5 4.Nd6+ Ke5 5.Ng4+ Kd5 6.c4+ Bxc4 7.Ne3+ Ke5 >8.Ndxc4+ Ke4 9.Nxd2+ Kd3 10.Nxb1 > +- (4.74) Depth: 21 00:34:58 1156402kN >1.Neg4+! > +- (5.04) Depth: 22 00:53:15 1735924kN > >(Galati, ` 21.01.2001) Well ... you've got a start :), but you really should try it with Rebel, that one solved it, and that's how I got this position, I think Ed posted this a long time ago. I'd say it's a mate in 30 ... but that would spoil the fun, now wouldn't it :?) >But then I just saw that position after I made that post (you'd think I'd pay >more attention!!) and I can see why that position is giving programs brain >freeze. There's just too many explosives in the stockade. Yeah ... I already wondered why it was so quiet around here after Leonid posted that ... exploding computers all over the place :) Paul
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.