Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: WAC #199 and WAC #273

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 10:37:47 02/17/98

Go up one level in this thread


On February 17, 1998 at 12:46:39, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>
>Mine scores Ng3+ as mate in 18 after 40 minutes on a P2/300.
>
>Which is not to say that this is accurate, or that Ng3+ is best.  I'll
>let it run longer.
>
>bruce

Aw shit...  I didn't look at the output carefully enough.  You are
correct...  I don't have the complete PV as it was terminated by a
hash hit, but CB claimed this is a mate in 20.  It is *notorious* for
finding a slightly longer than optimal mate however, so your 18 could
well be correct.

I was fooled in that the +7 PV matched the next PV.  I didn't notice the
mate score as CB doesn't display things like Mat18 and so forth.  It
shows
the integer score...

So in this case, Ng3 seems correct, although I'd probably argue that if
g3 does produce a score of +12, that's winning too.  I despise positions
where you can win the queen or you can mate the opponent.  Because
either
wins...

This was Harry's favorite position I believe.   (Harry Nelson).  He
liked
the way our extensions picked this up in a heartbeat.  One has to do
with
capturing adjacent to the king without being a checking move.  These
extend
(in CB, *not* Crafty) just like checks do, which can be a little
dangerous.
But at 5M nodes per second, we could spare a few here and there.  :)

I'm going to try to re-run it on the Cray to get the full PV, then we
can
compare notes.  But I do have a note in my file where Harry gripes about
our
finding a mate that is too deep, that there is a shorter one available.
He
"proved" this with human and computer analysis... but at some point,
there
was a couple of checking moves that could be replaced by a quiet move to
shorten the mate.  We didn't see that, even with singular extensions...
The quiet move pretty well cut everything off short...

I used to have a really *really* hard mate in 8 to find.  Hard because
the
first 7 moves were all non-checks.  But they were definitely forcing as
they
would threaten mate.  I'm not sure we ever really "solved" that one in
any
reasonable amount of time.  I think one version finally solved it in a
minute
or two, which seems unreasonable for a mate in 8 using that machine.
I'll see
if I can find this thing.

I also used to have a few ugly positions that would exercise extensions.
 IE
one position where the first 20 plies or so are all forced...  each move
a
check, which also gets that side out of check, and it is the only legal
move.
This shredded Cray Blitz several times.  Each time I'd modify the
parallel
search, Harry would toss this position at it and it would promptly crash
and
burn.  Obviously singular extensions runs this out *quite* deeply.  :)





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.