Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:31:11 01/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2001 at 10:31:50, Hermano Ecuadoriano wrote: >On January 23, 2001 at 04:18:13, Walter Eigenmann wrote: > >>On my PIII/866Mhz/256Mb I let play a match over 10 games (30Min per game) >>between ChessTiger 13.0 and Crafty18.1 with " Ert0.4 " under RebelII. CT 13 is a >>good programm, of course - but 0,5:9,5 against the strongest WB amateur engine?? >> How was that possible? Does someone have similar results?? > > > >PII-300 48M hash 5M hashp 32M tbcache > >Gambit Tiger - wcrafty-18.01 > >Time control 5 3 Gambit Tiger +12 -12 =7 >Time control 15 10 Gambit Tiger +10 -3 =2 > >(One is tempted to extrapolate to a big score for GT on your machine.) > >Tiger13 - wcrafty-18.01 > >Time control 5 3 Tiger13 +13 -6 =14 > >I have no doubt that Tiger13 is better against Crafty than Gambit Tiger, >based on the scores, and on my judgement of the games. >I believe your score is possible, but unlikely to repeat. There are lots of reasons why such a score _could_ happen. From the simple "Tiger is just much better" to "crafty is too big and is paging" if he is using EGTB's for example... Or it could be as easy as a poor book. Or poor programming on my part. Or anywhere in between...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.