Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 14:51:13 01/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2001 at 16:02:29, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 23, 2001 at 15:49:44, Ernst Walet wrote: > >>On January 23, 2001 at 15:45:13, Ernst Walet wrote: >> >>>I'm wondering what gives better results, conservative probing with 3-4-5 piece >>>tb's, or agressively probing without the 5 piece. The latter hardly slows down >>>the search due to the fact that the 30 MB of 3 and 4 piece tb's easely fit into >>>the cache (if large enough of course). What do you think, Dieter? >>> >>>I suppose that the testing you describe was done with all 3,4 and 5 piece tb's? >>> >>>Ernst. >> >>Sorry, forget the last question, after re-reading your post I found the answer. > >I also have a setup on my machine with just 4 piece files and accidentally ran >against it for a few hours. It takes far longer to find the solution with only >the 4 piece files for this position. The five piece files are a definite, clear >win for Yace in this one. Do you have any idea if, when using 3+4+5 piece table bases, conservative use produce better results because the speed of the program gets less restricted? I personally tend to think so. Ernst.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.