Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 21:07:06 01/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2001 at 14:45:15, Peter Kasinski wrote: >On January 22, 2001 at 15:54:32, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On January 22, 2001 at 12:52:04, Peter Kasinski wrote: >> >>> >>>I am trying to understand the impact of _not_ having some of the tablebases on >>>programs like Crafty or Deep Fritz. Loading K+Q+Q+R vs K on my hard disk seems >>>almost frivolous. Would it weaken the program if some of these _clearly always >>>won_ cases were not present? >>> >>>thanks, >>>PK >> >>It is better to have _all_. Crafty calls Eugene's probe code when the number >>of pieces on the board drops to some value (5 if you have any 5 piece files >>available). If you don't have that file, I call his code, he returns "failure" >>and we keep searching. If you have them all, then _every_ call will be >>successful and it is more efficient... > >I understand. But in that case, how about the current 6-man files. Does it make >sense to use these at all? As soon as Crafty reaches that stage it will start >probing the 6-man tablebases - which at this stage will be a futile attempt in >_most_ cases... Am I right? > >thanks, >PK I'm not using them at present. I probably will once we get some with pawns. I think that practical 6 piece files are a year or two away as we really need to see 500gig drives...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.