Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: World Champion defeated by russian program (OT)

Author: Paul Doire

Date: 07:33:22 01/24/01

Go up one level in this thread


On January 23, 2001 at 15:44:09, Peter Berger wrote:

>On January 23, 2001 at 13:24:34, Paul Doire wrote:
>
>>On January 23, 2001 at 11:51:44, Peter Berger wrote:
>>
>>>On January 23, 2001 at 07:53:53, Vladimir Sokolov wrote:
>>>
>>>>After reception of Millenium 2001 packet we tested immediately.
>>>>There is a weakness in the tactics of Shredder 5.0 and my program find the
>>>>weakness and use it. It is simple weakness but if anybody sees the weakness.
>>>>In small tournament of 5 games, in 4 games without interruption Shredder was
>>>>defeated with Auto232 between 2 computers of each AMD Athlon T-bird 1.2 mhz /
>>>>1024 ram with Asus A7V ATX multi motherboard at 40 moves in 2 hours with each
>>>>own book, hash 256 Mb and all tablebases 3-4-5
>>>>Maybe next year in international championship my private program also if the
>>>>airplane is not expensive.
>>>>The 5 games pgn files of small tournament are available at request to my E mail.
>>>>
>>>>Vladimir
>>>
>>>Wow , didn't you get some unfriendly answers ;-) ?
>>>
>>>Just to mention : nowhere in this post is anything said that claims this Russian
>>>program is stronger than Shredder .
>>
>>
>>BTW the title says it all.
>>Paul
>
>I wonder why all those responses to Mr Sokolv's post do annoy me .
>
>The title says it all ?
>
>No , the title says "World champion defeated by russian program" which is
>exactly what happened in this match . This doesn't necessarily mean that the
>author claims his program is stronger than this "world champion" .
>
>Did you even bother to have a look at these games ? My guess is : no .
>
>Everybody communicates in English here as this is the most convenient way but I
>am sometimes annoyed if people become picky with foreigners .
>
>I understand people with native language English , I also usually get their
>undertone very well . I obviously have an easy time to understand people whose
>native language is German , too .
>
>I have a hard time understanding hidden messages in posts from some South
>Americans though , also their humour seems to work in a slightly different way .
>This doesn't mean their English is any worse , but it does mean their thoughts
>sometimes don't make it through the double language barrier : theirs _and_ mine
>.
>
>Just imagine your program just beat Shredder in a very convincing way , or maybe
>imagine : YOU just beat Kasparov 4 games in a row .
>
>I think if _I_ managed to do this I might post something like "German patzer
>beats the best player of the world " , I might even do it _here_ although it
>would be completely off-topic :-)
>
>I don't remember any posts from Mr Sokolov from the past so this seems to be the
>"welcome" he got from the club members .
>
>Please understand that this is not an answer guided completely towards _your_
>answer but also some general thought regarding communication in a language which
>is foreign to quite a few .
>
>Tolerance is important here and it might be a good guideline to expect people
>don't intend anything bad at all if you see something a little irritating until
>verified .
>
>pete

Hi Peter,
This is ironic,because I have posted a number of games and results from some of
the top programs from time to time,and when I forgot some trivial detail about
the match I was blasted off this page for not having the "proper" and
"verified data". My Crafty vs CT13 match comes to mind. I posted the crafty.rc
file in its various forms throughout the matches and was promptly reemed for
this configuration or that.I apparently should have used worse grammar and
forgotten a few words, then the need to scientifically prove my findings(pgn's
or at least the name of the program!!)would have been unnecessary!
I always thought regardless of the language involved that unsubstantiated claims
should be kept to onesself, for lack of data.
Otherwise I could come to a forum such as this one and lay claim to any
preposterous event. The caliber of the people that post here requires proof of
ones findings, not heresay.

Regards,
Paul



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.