Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 10:03:21 01/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 24, 2001 at 03:11:56, Severi Salminen wrote: >>I didn't do this in Cray Blitz so there is an alternative. Do the normal >>search, but each time you search a legal move, inc a counter. When you are >>done searching all moves, if the counter == 1, there was only one legal one >>to search. Search it _again_ but one ply deeper... > >Sounds time consuming...I hate all these researchs :) I _do_ use a legal move It should not be, I think. It is like an internal iterative deepening. Moreover, it could be faster! couldn't be? >counter (for other purposes) but I believe it is faster to generate only legal >"check evasive" moves as I allready pass the "being in check" information to the >next ply. One question, you people do extend when there is a single move. This is an extra extension besides "check extensions"? In other words, if king is in check --> depth+=1 and if there is only one reply --> depth+=2 (assuming no fractional increments) ? Regards, Miguel > >Severi
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.